[PATCH] Fix formatting of init_target_chars calls
Jakub Jelinek
jakub@redhat.com
Thu Feb 1 13:35:00 GMT 2007
Hi!
While looking at PR middle-end/30473, I have noticed a formatting glitch.
Is this something we want to fix on the trunk?
2007-02-01 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
* builtins.c (expand_builtin_printf, expand_builtin_fprintf,
expand_builtin_sprintf, fold_builtin_sprintf,
maybe_emit_sprintf_chk_warning, fold_builtin_sprintf_chk,
fold_builtin_snprintf_chk, fold_builtin_printf,
fold_builtin_fprintf): Fix formatting of init_target_chars call.
--- gcc/builtins.c.jj 2007-02-01 11:03:12.000000000 +0100
+++ gcc/builtins.c 2007-02-01 14:20:20.000000000 +0100
@@ -5108,7 +5108,7 @@ expand_builtin_printf (tree exp, rtx tar
if (fmt_str == NULL)
return 0;
- if (!init_target_chars())
+ if (!init_target_chars ())
return 0;
/* If the format specifier was "%s\n", call __builtin_puts(arg). */
@@ -5224,7 +5224,7 @@ expand_builtin_fprintf (tree exp, rtx ta
if (fmt_str == NULL)
return 0;
- if (!init_target_chars())
+ if (!init_target_chars ())
return 0;
/* If the format specifier was "%s", call __builtin_fputs(arg,fp). */
@@ -5316,7 +5316,7 @@ expand_builtin_sprintf (tree arglist, rt
if (fmt_str == NULL)
return 0;
- if (!init_target_chars())
+ if (!init_target_chars ())
return 0;
/* If the format doesn't contain % args or %%, use strcpy. */
@@ -10562,7 +10563,7 @@ fold_builtin_sprintf (tree arglist, int
call = NULL_TREE;
retval = NULL_TREE;
- if (!init_target_chars())
+ if (!init_target_chars ())
return 0;
/* If the format doesn't contain % args or %%, use strcpy. */
@@ -10901,7 +10910,7 @@ maybe_emit_sprintf_chk_warning (tree exp
if (fmt_str == NULL)
return;
- if (!init_target_chars())
+ if (!init_target_chars ())
return;
/* If the format doesn't contain % args or %%, we know its size. */
@@ -11363,7 +11372,7 @@ fold_builtin_sprintf_chk (tree arglist,
len = NULL_TREE;
- if (!init_target_chars())
+ if (!init_target_chars ())
return 0;
/* Check whether the format is a literal string constant. */
@@ -11488,7 +11497,7 @@ fold_builtin_snprintf_chk (tree arglist,
return 0;
}
- if (!init_target_chars())
+ if (!init_target_chars ())
return 0;
/* Only convert __{,v}snprintf_chk to {,v}snprintf if flag is 0
@@ -11572,7 +11581,7 @@ fold_builtin_printf (tree fndecl, tree a
fn_puts = implicit_built_in_decls[BUILT_IN_PUTS];
}
- if (!init_target_chars())
+ if (!init_target_chars ())
return 0;
if (strcmp (fmt_str, target_percent_s) == 0 || strchr (fmt_str, target_percent) == NULL)
@@ -11733,7 +11742,7 @@ fold_builtin_fprintf (tree fndecl, tree
fn_fputs = implicit_built_in_decls[BUILT_IN_FPUTS];
}
- if (!init_target_chars())
+ if (!init_target_chars ())
return 0;
/* If the format doesn't contain % args or %%, use strcpy. */
Jakub
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list