[LTO][PATCH] Fix long double precision problem

Doug Kwan (關振德) dougkwan@google.com
Mon Dec 17 21:53:00 GMT 2007

Would that easier and less error prone if we just emit the precision?
I looked at the i386 and ia64 backend and found float types with
precisions 32, 64, 80, 82 and 128. I am not sure if there is an easy
way to do the search in an architecture-indepedent manner?


2007/12/16, Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>:

> That seems reasonable enough.  I guess the LTO front end can process a
> complex type by dividing its size by two, and then searching for a
> matching integral or floating-point base type, and using that information.

More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list