[PATCH,vect] Committed ppc cost model options

Dorit Nuzman DORIT@il.ibm.com
Thu Dec 6 16:40:00 GMT 2007


"Sebastian Pop" <sebpop@gmail.com> wrote on 06/12/2007 18:16:02:

> Dorit, Harsha,
>
> I've committed the following patch after bootstrap and test on
amd64-linux.
>

thanks

(I assume this is Harsha's final version of the patch, that I approved a
few days ago - http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-12/msg00029.html ?)

dorit

> Sebastian
> --
> AMD - GNU Tools
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From:  <spop@gcc13.fsffrance.org>
> Date: Dec 5, 2007 11:17 PM
> Subject: [regtest] Results for
> 2007_12_05_19_27_35_costmodel-early-scalar.diff.asc on
> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
> To: sebpop@gmail.com
>
>
> Checker: (2007_12_06_05_17_53): (cat
> /home/spop/trunk-tester/state/testing/patched/report
> there are no regressions with your patch.
> Checker: (2007_12_06_05_17_53): tac)
> Checker: (2007_12_06_05_17_53): FAILs with patched version:
> Checker: (2007_12_06_05_17_53): (cat
> /home/spop/trunk-tester/state/testing/patched/failed
> gcc.sum gcc.dg/torture/builtin-pow-mpfr-1.c
> gcc.sum gcc.dg/tree-prof/bb-reorg.c
> libmudflap.sum libmudflap.c++/pass41-frag.cxx
> libstdc++.sum abi_check
> Checker: (2007_12_06_05_17_53): tac)
> Checker: (2007_12_06_05_17_53): FAILs with pristine version:
> Checker: (2007_12_06_05_17_53): (cat
> /home/spop/trunk-tester/state/trunk/130639/failed
> gcc.sum gcc.dg/torture/builtin-pow-mpfr-1.c
> gcc.sum gcc.dg/tree-prof/bb-reorg.c
> libmudflap.sum libmudflap.c++/pass41-frag.cxx
> libstdc++.sum abi_check
> Checker: (2007_12_06_05_17_53): tac)
> Checker: (2007_12_06_05_17_53): The files used for the validation of
> your patch are stored in
> /home/spop/trunk-tester/state/patched/2007_12_06_05_17_53 on the
> tester machine.
> [attachment "2007_12_05_19_27_35_costmodel-early-scalar.diff.asc"
> deleted by Dorit Nuzman/Haifa/IBM]



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list