[PATCH][RFC] Introduce type safety and debuggability into tree.h
Diego Novillo
dnovillo@google.com
Thu Aug 9 22:59:00 GMT 2007
On 8/9/07 4:55 PM, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> Yes, and, hence, we will always avoid the merge pain. :-)
Ah, sure, that's a good point :)
> I just don't see that there's that much advantage in advertising whether
> or not something is a macro in this way, relative to the pain. We're
> probably talking about changes to 50% of the lines in many files in the
> compiler.
I agree. I don't really have a strong preference for this.
Historically we've named these in capitals, the names are probably
pretty entrenched in people's minds.
Moreover, it probably simplifies Simon's patch quite a bit. I'll go
with the popular vote here. I don't really mind.
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list