Reload bug & SRA oddness
Alexandre Oliva
aoliva@redhat.com
Mon Apr 30 19:08:00 GMT 2007
On Apr 30, 2007, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Apr 30, 2007, Bernd Schmidt <bernds_cb1@t-online.de> wrote:
>> As a consequence of all these problems, I'd like to see this patch
>> reverted for now until it we know how to do it properly.
> Sounds like a reasonable trade-off. I'm sorry that I haven't had time
> to look into this throughout the past two weeks. I was finally able
> to start looking into this yesterday, but I haven't got anywhere so
> far.
Here's the reversal patch I'm checking in.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: gcc-sra-bit-field-ref-revert.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 27508 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/attachments/20070430/c52fd475/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
--
Alexandre Oliva http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
FSF Latin America Board Member http://www.fsfla.org/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list