[PATCH] [PR/31615] fix for testsuite failure in gfortran.dg/vect/vect-5.f90 on sparc

[Dorit Nuzman]

Will commit this as obvious - the expectation to see this printed three
times:
      "Alignment of access forced using versioning."
is probably a typo, cause there are only two data references in the only
loop that gets vectorized here, so we can version to align only two
accesses.

Tested on i386-linux and powerpc-linux, but this patch does not affect
these targets.
Tested by Kaveh on sparc.
                                                                            
                                                                            
                                                                            

To be committed to mainline as obvious,

dorit

ChangeLog:

* gfortran.dg/vect/vect-5.f90: Fix dg-final test.

Index: gfortran.dg/vect/vect-5.f90
===================================================================
*** gfortran.dg/vect/vect-5.f90 (revision 124158)
--- gfortran.dg/vect/vect-5.f90 (working copy)
***************
*** 38,44 ****
  ! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 1 loops" 1 "vect"  } }
  ! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Alignment of access forced using
peeling" 1 "vect" { xfail { vect_no_align } } } }
  ! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Vectorizing an unaligned access" 1
"vect" { xfail { vect_no_align } } } }
! ! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Alignment of access forced using
versioning." 3 "vect" { target { ilp32 && vect_no_align } } } }

  ! We also expect to vectorize one loop for lp64 targets that support
  ! misaligned access:
--- 38,44 ----
  ! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 1 loops" 1 "vect"  } }
  ! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Alignment of access forced using
peeling" 1 "vect" { xfail { vect_no_align } } } }
  ! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Vectorizing an unaligned access" 1
"vect" { xfail { vect_no_align } } } }
! ! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Alignment of access forced using
versioning." 2 "vect" { target { ilp32 && vect_no_align } } } }

  ! We also expect to vectorize one loop for lp64 targets that support
  ! misaligned access: