Reload bug & SRA oddness

[Bernd Schmidt]

Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Apr 20, 2007, Bernd Schmidt <bernds_cb1@t-online.de> wrote:
> 
>> Alex, any particular reason why you made this change in
>> the first place?
> 
> Sure.  IIRC, without it, we'd initialize scalarized fields, fail to
> copy them into the unscalarized variable, then block-copy the entire
> variable with outdated contents.

Doesn't this indicate we're passing the wrong value for the IS_OUTPUT 
arg of scalarize_use somewhere?

> I remember this was one of the last
> fixes I added to the patch, so taking it out you're certainly going to
> observe regressions on x86_64-linux-gnu and/or i686-linux-gnu.

Bootstrap completed, and no check-gcc regressions on i686-linux.  Can 
you send me a testcase that fails when this change is made?


Bernd
-- 
This footer brought to you by insane German lawmakers.
Analog Devices GmbH      Wilhelm-Wagenfeld-Str. 6      80807 Muenchen
Registergericht Muenchen HRB 40368
Geschaeftsfuehrer Thomas Wessel, Vincent Roche, Joseph E. McDonough