[PATCH] CONSTANT_ALIGNMENT is missed in builtins.c

[Richard Guenther]

On 9/1/06, Roger Sayle <roger@eyesopen.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Richard and Adam,
>
> On Fri, 1 Sep 2006, Adam Nemet wrote:
> > Richard Guenther writes:
> > > So if 27226 finally is a regression the patch in there looks more complete.
> > > Can you verify it works for you?
> >
> > That's nice.  Yes it works and it is a regression with dhrystone as
> > Joern has mentioned it.  Thanks for noticing this.
>
> Ok, in that case Richard's patch for middle-end/27226, as attached in
> comment #13, is OK for mainline, with an appropriate ChangeLog entry,
> and for the 4.1 branch after a while on mainline without problems.
>
> Richard could you also add Adam's new MIPS testcase to the testsuite
> when you commit your patch.  I appreciate that you probably can't test
> it, and confirm it works yourself, but its good to have a test to
> ensure we don't regress again in future.  If anyone can come up with
> an x86 test, that'd be even better, but not required.
>
> Thanks to you both.

Ok, I'll re-spin a round of testing and commit together with the testcase.

Richard.