[PATCH] PR29033: i18n issue

[Dirk Mueller]

On Monday 30 October 2006 17:00, Andrew Pinski wrote:

> I would rather have the code look like:
> Though I don't know which one is preferred by the coding style.

As far as I can see, the GNU GCC coding style doesn't specify this particular 
case, so the one from the GNU coding style should apply, which I adhered to:

http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/standards.html#Internationalization

The thing that surprises me is that this doesn't work with the way gcc 
extracts the po strings. I don't quite see why the G_() macro is necessary, 
but it wasn't important enough to me to debug this in detail.


Dirki