"libgcc_so" typo in mklibgcc.in

Janis Johnson janis187@us.ibm.com
Mon Nov 27 21:17:00 GMT 2006

On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 08:05:25PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 10:18:53AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > I've begun bringing toplevel libgcc up to date for stage 1.  While
> > examining the merge conflicts I noticed this:
> >
> > 109856        bje   if [ "@enable_decimal_float@" = "yes" -a -z "$libgcc_so" ]; then
> >
> > It doesn't work; libgcc_so is never set.  There's a variable
> > libgcc_s_so, but I don't think testing that here is right either; why
> > should a shared libgcc disable DFP support?
> By the way, the net result of this is that (A) the DFP routines are
> only added to the non-shared libgcc, and (B) they're added regardless
> of --enable-shared.  That's how I've left it on the branch, where DFP
> now works.

We made a conscious decision to include the DFP support only in the
static version of libgcc for now, due to the fact that the definition
of the language extension is still evolving and the ABIs are likely
to change.


More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list