"libgcc_so" typo in mklibgcc.in

Daniel Jacobowitz drow@false.org
Mon Nov 27 01:17:00 GMT 2006

On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 10:18:53AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> I've begun bringing toplevel libgcc up to date for stage 1.  While
> examining the merge conflicts I noticed this:
> 109856        bje   if [ "@enable_decimal_float@" = "yes" -a -z "$libgcc_so" ]; then
> It doesn't work; libgcc_so is never set.  There's a variable
> libgcc_s_so, but I don't think testing that here is right either; why
> should a shared libgcc disable DFP support?

By the way, the net result of this is that (A) the DFP routines are
only added to the non-shared libgcc, and (B) they're added regardless
of --enable-shared.  That's how I've left it on the branch, where DFP
now works.

Daniel Jacobowitz

More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list