"libgcc_so" typo in mklibgcc.in
Daniel Jacobowitz
drow@false.org
Mon Nov 27 01:17:00 GMT 2006
On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 10:18:53AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> I've begun bringing toplevel libgcc up to date for stage 1. While
> examining the merge conflicts I noticed this:
>
> 109856 bje if [ "@enable_decimal_float@" = "yes" -a -z "$libgcc_so" ]; then
>
> It doesn't work; libgcc_so is never set. There's a variable
> libgcc_s_so, but I don't think testing that here is right either; why
> should a shared libgcc disable DFP support?
By the way, the net result of this is that (A) the DFP routines are
only added to the non-shared libgcc, and (B) they're added regardless
of --enable-shared. That's how I've left it on the branch, where DFP
now works.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list