[PING][Patch]: multilib fixes for libjava

Jack Howarth howarth@bromo.msbb.uc.edu
Thu Nov 16 16:36:00 GMT 2006

    My mistake. The correct message with the original patch is


Sorry about that.

On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 03:51:39PM +0000, Andrew Haley wrote:
> Jack Howarth writes:
>  >    Can I get a review on...
>  > 
>  > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-11/msg00091.html
>  > 
>  > ...at least for gcc trunk before bit rot sets
>  > in?
> Wouldn't it be a good idea to post an actual patch to gcc-patches,
> with a ChangeLog?
> Lest anyone think this is waiting on me, let me say that I have no
> problem with this.  It is for Darwin maintainers to comment.
> But they won't see it, because Darwin does not appear in the Subject
> line and libjava does.
> Andrew.

More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list