[RFC] Fix PR28684

Clint Whaley whaley@cs.utsa.edu
Thu Nov 16 15:35:00 GMT 2006


>I wasn't sure if general strength reduction was still controlled by the
>flag, but if it is, we need to mention it, and again the user can 

Just to mention, if we need strength reduction, the definition that would
make me happiest would be that no new flops are introduced by it, but
some may be removed.  Then, only the people doing things like NaN traps
need worry.  I.e., 2.0*a <--> a+a and a+b-b -> a would be OK, but
3*a -> a+a+a would not be allowed . . .


More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list