RFA: tuples merge for GIMPLE_MODIFY_STMT

Andrew Pinski pinskia@physics.uc.edu
Wed Nov 15 19:21:00 GMT 2006

> Aldy Hernandez wrote on 11/11/06 04:47:
> > I have fixed this in the included patch, by generating a GIMPLE_MODIFY_STMT
> > instead of INIT_EXPR.  I'm not to gimplifier savvy enough to know if this will
> > miss out on optimizations, or if I'm side stepping some tenet of the
> > gimplifier.  This approach fixes the problem, bootstraps, and does not
> > introduce any regressions.
> > 
> > What do you think?
> > 
> It shouldn't block anything.  We don't really use INIT_EXPR for anything 
> these days.

Or do we: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-08/msg00771.html ?
A patch from this year for using the semantics of INIT_EXPR, in fact I think
this is the same spot which is being changed.

-- Pinski

More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list