[wwwdocs] remove http://www.devphil.com references

Gerald Pfeifer gerald@pfeifer.com
Sun Nov 12 17:47:00 GMT 2006


Hi Phil,

in my tests over the last half a year or so www.devphil.com was never 
reachable.  Do you think this is going to change, or should we go with 
something like the patch below (which I have not installed yet)?

What do you recommend?

Gerald

Index: bugs/reghunt.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/bugs/reghunt.html,v
retrieving revision 1.12
diff -u -3 -p -r1.12 reghunt.html
--- bugs/reghunt.html	18 Feb 2005 11:04:21 -0000	1.12
+++ bugs/reghunt.html	12 Nov 2006 17:38:36 -0000
@@ -268,14 +268,6 @@ space as the full repository.</p>
     tar `cat rsync_exclude` -cf - gcc-cvs | gzip > gcc-cvs.tar.gz
 </pre>
 
-<p>If you have preprocessed source code for your test case, Phil Edwards
-maintains an <a href="http://www.devphil.com/~reghunt/">automated regression
-search engine</a> which can help narrow down the range of dates in certain
-cases.  The main development branch can be searched back to pre-3.0 days,
-and other branches are available with less history.  (Note:  this web
-server is not always running.)
-</p>
-
 <h2><a name="problems">Work around problems</a></h2>
 
 <p>If one of the test builds fails, try a date or time slightly earlier or
Index: testing/index.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/testing/index.html,v
retrieving revision 1.22
diff -u -3 -p -r1.22 index.html
--- testing/index.html	18 Feb 2005 11:04:22 -0000	1.22
+++ testing/index.html	12 Nov 2006 17:38:36 -0000
@@ -21,10 +21,8 @@ the test suite directories.</p>
 
 <ul>
   <li>Phil Edwards runs a build and regression tester referred to as
-      the <a href="http://www.devphil.com/build/">Autocrasher</a>, which
-      tries to nag people via email when they break things.  It pays
-      special attention to C++ binary compatibility.  (Note:  this web
-      server is not always running.)</li>
+      the which tries to nag people via email when they break things.
+      It pays special attention to C++ binary compatibility.
 
   <li>Several people perform regular builds and regression test runs and
       send their test results to the



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list