fixincludes for glibc 'inline' non-C99 conformance
Andrew Pinski
pinskia@gmail.com
Sat Nov 4 05:29:00 GMT 2006
On Fri, 2006-11-03 at 20:43 -0800, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Nov 3, 2006, at 8:14 PM, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > For full disclosure, I will note that this didn't break Geoff's daily
> > builds, but did break mine; but since I admit I don't have the time to
> > fix it, I'm just going to stop using HEAD until something slightly
> > more
> > like a consensus emerges.
>
> ? Did his follow-on patch where he added fixinclude magic to make it
> build again fix it for you?
Daniel's automatic build also included a build of glibc which failed
which is what Daniel was mentioning.
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list