[patch] cp/*.c: Fix comment typos.

[Kazu Hirata]

Hi,

Committed as obvious.

Kazu Hirata

2006-05-28  Kazu Hirata  <kazu@codesourcery.com>

	* decl.c, decl2.c, parser.c: Fix comment typos.  Follow
	spelling conventions.

Index: cp/decl.c
===================================================================
--- cp/decl.c	(revision 114167)
+++ cp/decl.c	(working copy)
@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ struct named_label_entry GTY(())
 
   /* The following bits are set after the label is defined, and are
      updated as scopes are popped.  They indicate that a backward jump
-     to the label will illegally enter a scope of the given flavour.  */
+     to the label will illegally enter a scope of the given flavor.  */
   bool in_try_scope;
   bool in_catch_scope;
   bool in_omp_scope;
Index: cp/decl2.c
===================================================================
--- cp/decl2.c	(revision 114167)
+++ cp/decl2.c	(working copy)
@@ -2106,7 +2106,7 @@ start_objects (int method_type, int init
 
   /* We cannot allow these functions to be elided, even if they do not
      have external linkage.  And, there's no point in deferring
-     compilation of thes functions; they're all going to have to be
+     compilation of these functions; they're all going to have to be
      out anyhow.  */
   DECL_INLINE (current_function_decl) = 0;
   DECL_UNINLINABLE (current_function_decl) = 1;
Index: cp/parser.c
===================================================================
--- cp/parser.c	(revision 114167)
+++ cp/parser.c	(working copy)
@@ -13107,7 +13107,7 @@ cp_parser_class_head (cp_parser* parser,
 	 define a class that has already been declared with this
 	 syntax.
 
-	 The proposed resolution for Core Issue 180 says that whever
+	 The proposed resolution for Core Issue 180 says that wherever
 	 you see `class T::X' you should treat `X' as a type-name.
 
 	 It is OK to define an inaccessible class; for example: