gfortran testsuite regression, gfortran.dg/entry_3.f90

[H. J. Lu]

On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 05:28:14PM +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On 5/5/06, Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu> wrote:
> >
> >On May 5, 2006, at 7:26 AM, François-Xavier Coudert wrote:
> >
> >>> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27437
> >>
> >> Humpf. Does that mean that the patch wasn't regtested before being
> >> applied?
> >
> >No, it was regression tested, just not on x86-linux-gnu like most
> >people is
> >doing.
> 
> I'm surprised, then, that on whatever target it was tested it passed
> because of the NEXT_INSN/PREV_INSN bug that HJ mentions in the PR.
> 
> IMHO the patch should be reverted until it is fixed and tested properly...


I would suggest this patch.


H.J.
----
2006-05-05  H.J. Lu  <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>

	* opts.c (decode_options): Don't turn on SEE for -O3.

--- gcc/opts.c.see	2006-05-04 10:59:02.000000000 -0700
+++ gcc/opts.c	2006-05-05 08:54:22.000000000 -0700
@@ -510,7 +510,6 @@ decode_options (unsigned int argc, const
       flag_inline_functions = 1;
       flag_unswitch_loops = 1;
       flag_gcse_after_reload = 1;
-      flag_see = 1; 
     }
 
   if (optimize < 2 || optimize_size)