[Patch] Add option to reduce amount of reflection data to gcj...
David Daney
ddaney@avtrex.com
Wed Mar 15 17:49:00 GMT 2006
Ranjit Mathew wrote:
>
> [Some nitpicking from a Texinfo newbie and enthusiast.]
>
> David Daney wrote:
>
>>
>>+@item -freduced-reflection
>
>
> The rest of the options in this list also do not follow this,
> but still: Shouldn't this be "@item @option{-freduced-reflection}"
> instead?
>
>
>
>>+For code that does not use reflection (i.e. the methods in the
>>+@code{java.lang.reflect} package), @code{-freduced-reflection}
>>+will result in proper operation with a savings in executable code size.
>>+
>>+JNI (@code{-fjni}) and the binary compatibility ABI
>>+(@code{-findirect-dispatch}) do not work properly without full
>>+reflection meta-data. Because of this, it is an error to use these options
>>+with @code{-freduced-reflection}.
>
>
> "@option{-fjni}" instead of "@code{-fjni}",
> "@option{-findirect-dispatch}" instead of "@code{-findirect-dispatch}",
> etc.
>
Well I would say in theory, you are correct. However I think it is best
to commit it as is because the rest of the file uses similar style.
Then there should probably be a follow on patch to use @option{} in the
proper places in the entire file.
David Daney.
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list