[PATCH]: Remove some unconditional SMT usage updates
Andrew Pinski
pinskia@physics.uc.edu
Fri Mar 3 17:26:00 GMT 2006
>
> On Fri, 2006-03-03 at 11:57 -0500, Diego Novillo wrote:
> > On 03/03/06 11:36, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> >
> > > @@ -2194,6 +2196,7 @@ tree_sra (void)
> > > scan_function ();
> > > decide_instantiations ();
> > > scalarize_function ();
> > > + todoflags = TODO_update_smt_usage;
> > >
> > I would rather do this in either decide_instantiations. If any var in
> > sra_candidates is an array, then flip TODO_update_smt_usage on todoflags
> > (and make todoflags a file static).
> >
>
> Okay.
> I mistakenly thought that if we get into this clause, we are definitely
> going to scalarize, but i see that is not true.
>
>
> > I don't think we SRA structures with arrays
> I believe Richard Guenther added the ability to do this.
That was added back in 4.0.0 when RTH rewrote tree-sra.c.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-06/msg02515.html
-- Pinski
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list