[PATCH] Reduce GC overhead by introducing extra bins for function and basic_block

[Richard Guenther]

On 6/23/06, Steve Ellcey <sje@cup.hp.com> wrote:
> Richard, I am looking at PR 28138, and I think the problem is due to
> this patch.  I verified that the problem started with this checkin and
> then I looked at the prints from ggc_alloc_stat in ggc-page.c.  Among
> the output I get from the print at the end of ggc_alloc_stat is:
>
> Allocating object, requested size=511, actual=1 at 0x2000000005450001 on 0x6000000000348f40
>
> Obviously, requesting 511 bytes and getting 1 is a bad thing.  I haven't
> figured out where the code is going wrong yet but I thought I would see if
> you had any ideas while I continued to look.

This should be fixed with the checkin today, size_lookup was missing one member
(for index 511).

Richard.