[Patch, fortran] PR16206 - array initializers
Steve Kargl
sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu
Mon Jun 19 20:14:00 GMT 2006
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 02:31:38PM +0200, Paul Thomas wrote:
>
> The attached responds to your questions/details. It regtests on
> FC5/Athlon. Is it OK with the original testcase?
>
> I realised a few minutes ago that the submitted version of the
> transformational intrinsics patch was (i) not the final version in
> simplify.c and (ii) was missing a small correction in
> expr.c(simplify_parameter_variable). This latter appears in the new
> version of the PR16206 patch, and I have attached the correct version of
> the simplify.c patch; sorry for that.
>
> I'll wait for you to OK both before committing.
>
> Many thanks, especially for picking up the memory leaks.
>
My last comment. In the following section of code, do really
mean to fallthrough to AR_FULL in the switch? If yes, then
the convention is to add a comment as I've shown below.
AFAICT, the patch is OK (with the fallthrough comment).
+ case AR_SECTION:
+ if (find_array_section (p, p->ref) == FAILURE)
+ return FAILURE;
+ p->ref->u.ar.type = AR_FULL;
+ /* FALLTHROUGH. */
case AR_FULL:
! if (p->ref->next != NULL
! && (p->ts.type == BT_CHARACTER || p->ts.type == BT_DERIVED))
{
! cons = p->value.constructor;
! for (; cons; cons = cons->next)
! {
! cons->expr->ref = copy_ref (p->ref->next);
! simplify_const_ref (cons->expr);
! }
}
! gfc_free_ref_list (p->ref);
! p->ref = NULL;
break;
--
Steve
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list