PR bootstrap/27963 - PR target/19970 [toplevel]
Ranjit Mathew
rmathew@gmail.com
Sun Jun 11 07:08:00 GMT 2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
David Ayers wrote:
>
> I feel that technically this can be regarded as a regression as one
> could previously enable java on the affected platforms by
> --enable-libgcj. So it's not clear to me, whether I need approval from
> the Mark as the release manager, or whether DJ's approval is sufficient
> for me to commit.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-06/msg00410.html
Mark, can you please approve this for mainline? It *is* a
regression for at least a couple of platforms, where Java
could previously be built using --enable-libgcj, but where
that is no longer sufficient and applying this patch is
now the only option.
Thanks in advance,
Ranjit.
- --
Ranjit Mathew Email: rmathew AT gmail DOT com
Bangalore, INDIA. Web: http://rmathew.com/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFEi8EmYb1hx2wRS48RAu7CAJ96ioIbJFQNChQQoT8kmtgXHdYP8ACglAab
QJnxf+JoXmXi8Hwe8+VatAA=
=GmIg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list