[patch] for PRs 27639 and 26719

[Eric Botcazou]

> the patch needs to be approved first; since Ian did not like naming of
> the function in the previous version of the patch, I am waiting on his
> comments regarding the proposed change.

I'd think that his not rejecting the new version is an implicit approval so 
you could probably go ahead at this point.  On the other hand, abiding by the 
letter of the law is certainly not to be criticized. :-)

-- 
Eric Botcazou