[PATCH] Renumber dump files, do not overwrite pass properties, cater for >100 tree dumps

Diego Novillo dnovillo@redhat.com
Thu Jan 26 14:40:00 GMT 2006


Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> If you tell me, since you were working on tree-ssa when they were
> added, yes. :-)
>
I'll have to think back.  In principle, I can't think of any good reason
why some of these couldn't use the standard dump file registration
mechanism.  Ideally, this whole array should be allocated dynamically. 
If that isn't possible right now, I think we could add a FIXME comment. 
I don't think your patch should be blocked because of this.

The .vcg pass should disappear.  I would rather have it converted to a
TODO or a TDF so it can be invoked at any time.



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list