Problem with contained procedures as of 110063

[Paul Thomas]

Tobi,

>Thanks for fixing the regressions so quickly, but the last phrase in this
>comment needs a spell-checking, probably a 'TODO' and maybe a 'would' or
>'should' (as in 'should be handled with global symbols').
>  
>
First, I should emit my slogan of the evening, "Dyslexics of the world 
untie!"

Second, the sydlexia has hidden the message.  The gfymbols already 
handle this; hence the use of "is".

What a pity we did not call them gfymbols....  I feel a patch coming on.

>Paul Thomas wrote:
>  
>
>>--- 611,623 ----
>>  
>>    if (sym && !sym->new && gfc_current_state () != COMP_INTERFACE)
>>      {
>>!       /* Trap another encompassed procedure with the same name.  All
>>! 	 these conditions are necessary to avoid picking up an entry
>>! 	 whose name clashes with that of the encompassing procedure;
>>! 	 that is more consistently handles with gfymbols.  */
>>    
>>
Thanks.

Paul