PATCH for c++/25979 that doesn't break 16405

[Andrew Pinski]

On Feb 11, 2006, at 4:44 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:

> Andrew Pinski wrote:
>>> What target is this on?  I can't reproduce it on x86 or x86_64.
>> I could reproduce the failure on i686-linux-gnu also.
>
> With the reduced testcase?

No but with gcc.c-torture/compile/20000804-1.c at -O3.
(which does recursive inlining in 4.1.0 and on the mainline).


-- Pinski