RFC: remove find_replacement. (pr24912 / pr25335)

Andrew Pinski pinskia@physics.uc.edu
Wed Feb 1 20:55:00 GMT 2006


> 
> > 
> > >>>>> Andrew Pinski writes:
> > 
> > Andrew> I should mention this is a regression unlike the long-double-128/glibc.
> > Andrew> Why should a non regression have a priority over a patch which should
> > Andrew> have been sought after sooner?
> > 
> > 	Because long-doiuble-128 affects a primary platform and the
> > regression does not.
> 
> No, the regression is just not known right now to affect a primary platform.
> The long-double-128 is only known to affect a primary platform because it
> was decided to change it.  
> 
> > 	Andrew, you repeatedly are complaining about the same issue and
> > not accepting the answer, which is not productive.

One more thing, there really was no discussion about this in the first place.
This is my problem with the process right now.  We need to solve this issue
before going forward.  Having more discussions between GNU projects
is a good thing.

-- Pinski



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list