Wmissing-parameter-type (PR7651 Define -Wextra strictly in terms of other warning flags)

Manuel López-Ibáñez lopezibanez@gmail.com
Fri Dec 22 11:42:00 GMT 2006

On 22/12/06, DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com> wrote:
> > I am just bootstrapping and testing the patch including the testcases
> > that you suggest. But still it makes me wonder why me and why now.
> The -Werror breakout is new.  I had to do this for the options I did
> (some of the attribute options), so I get to complain that you need to ;-)

I think I am not communicating as well as I should. I am going to
implement the testcases suggested by Jsm as requested by Gabriel,
namely, -Wnew-option enabling warning, -Wextra enabling warning,
-Wextra -Wno-new-option disabling the warning. I am not going to test
that -Werror generates an error instead of a warning. That is what I
understood that was asked for. If I misunderstood it, please correct
me and accept my apologies.

Unfortunately, you cut out the other tests mentioned in my mail that
we don't do and make more sense than testing Werror for every single
warning option.



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list