Much fallout from PR 27668
Wed Aug 9 07:38:00 GMT 2006
Lee Millward wrote:
> On 8/8/06, Mark Mitchell <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> I think that Volker's right. Let's back the original patch out of 4.1,
>> and leave well enough alone; let's just pursue this on the mainline.
> What should I do about the new bug reports for the regressions Volker
> has reported? Should I mark the patch reverting the fix for 27668 as
> fixing those bugs on the 4.1 branch and re-add the 4.1 regression
> marker to 27668 leaving the current regressions as against 4.2 only?
Yes, I think that's exactly right.
(650) 331-3385 x713
More information about the Gcc-patches