Much fallout from PR 27668
Tue Aug 8 18:19:00 GMT 2006
On 8/8/06, Mark Mitchell <email@example.com> wrote:
> I think that Volker's right. Let's back the original patch out of 4.1,
> and leave well enough alone; let's just pursue this on the mainline.
What should I do about the new bug reports for the regressions Volker
has reported? Should I mark the patch reverting the fix for 27668 as
fixing those bugs on the 4.1 branch and re-add the 4.1 regression
marker to 27668 leaving the current regressions as against 4.2 only?
More information about the Gcc-patches