remove reverse_die_lists

Mark Mitchell
Sun Apr 23 03:36:00 GMT 2006

David Edelsohn wrote:
>>>>>> Richard Guenther writes:
>> Are these patches somehow fix bugs or regressions?
> 	GCC has goals for compile time performance, not just performance
> of generated code, specific transformations, and new features.  Overall
> compile time regressions are regressions and any patches to improve that
> area are appreciated.

Certainly, as RM, I am happy to have improvements in compile-time
performance made at this point; I certainly consider our gradual
degredation in compile-time performance over time to be a bug.  On the
other hand, if Geoff's patches causes problems, we'll back them out
rather aggressively, since, as you say, they do not affect the core
correctness of the compiler.

Mark Mitchell
(650) 331-3385 x713

More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list