Question on PR26890, possible regression.

Jerry DeLisle
Fri Apr 7 23:12:00 GMT 2006

Jerry DeLisle wrote:

> Thanks for the explanation. I will commit the fix to put pad back where 
> it belongs shortly under the obvious rule.  I will also had a note 
> explaining this connection back to the frontend.  I will check the size 
> of the pad relative to the size of the other union to see where we stand.

Padding size reverted, this only affected trunk.

2006-04-07  Jerry DeLisle  <>

	PR libgfortran/26890
	* io/io.h: Revert change to pad size made on 2006-03-30.
	Add comment explaining dependency with fortran/trans-io.c.


More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list