Question on PR26890, possible regression.
Fri Apr 7 23:12:00 GMT 2006
Jerry DeLisle wrote:
> Thanks for the explanation. I will commit the fix to put pad back where
> it belongs shortly under the obvious rule. I will also had a note
> explaining this connection back to the frontend. I will check the size
> of the pad relative to the size of the other union to see where we stand.
Padding size reverted, this only affected trunk.
2006-04-07 Jerry DeLisle <firstname.lastname@example.org>
* io/io.h: Revert change to pad size made on 2006-03-30.
Add comment explaining dependency with fortran/trans-io.c.
More information about the Gcc-patches