[patch] 4.1 ivopts bug
Sat Apr 1 00:41:00 GMT 2006
On Friday 31 March 2006 17:31, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> Roger Sayle wrote:
> > I suspect Mark's decision would be easier if you also bootstrapped
> > and regression tested your patch on one or two primary platforms.
> That was in fact going to be my request. If I get to pick, IA32/x86_64
> should be one, and something RISCy for the other; SPARC, PowerPC,
> Itanium, MIPS, etc. If a bootstrap is inconvenient, a cross-compiler
> and regression-testing in simulation would work for me.
> I'm inclined to take the patch, given that wrong-code bugs are bad, and
> wrong-code bugs in SPEC are worse, given how many people evaluate by
> running SPEC, but I do want to be cautious, given the size of the patch.
I've bootstrapped and regression tested on i686-linux, x86_64-linux and
Ok to apply?
More information about the Gcc-patches