[PATCH] PR fortran/24005

[Paul Thomas]

Tobi,

>p->sym->name and q->sym->name should never be NULL.  Furthermore, the module
>  
>
If it is, I should like to know about it.  module.c does produce symbols 
with null name and stashes them in the pointer_info table.  I have not 
yet caught any of them escaping but have had it in mind to investigate 
why they are there at all and to get rid of them

>does "the right thing" with NULL arguments unlike FreeBSD's.  Alternatively,
>(if I understand C well enough) we could simply compare the string pointers
>(they're allocated by gfc_get_string) like so:
>  
>
Yes indeed.  Sometime, we should do a trawl through the compiler to 
ensure that they ar all allocated by gfc_get_string and to reduce the 
number strcmp's thereby.

Paul T