Incorrect DFA scheduling of output dependency.

[Vladimir N. Makarov]

Daniel Towner wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Does anyone know what happened to the following patch? It looks like it
> was never committed. I am planning on submitting a new port sometime
> soon, and the port relies on the patch.
>
>
It was approved but not committed.  The approval is still valid, so you 
can commit it into gcc when the stage 1 starts.

Vlad