[gfortran,patch] PR 15809, part 1

Erik Edelmann eedelman@acclab.helsinki.fi
Fri Sep 9 10:28:00 GMT 2005


paul@codesourcery.com wrote:
> > The better solution I'm thinking of is to just avoid calling
> > gfc_trans_deferred_array() for (any kind of) dummy arguments.
> 
> Possibly. This may end up being more hassle than just ignoring the ones where 
> we don't have to do anything.

I'm coming to the same conclusion.  I also now thinks that the
bug my patch is intended to fix, and the third (and, hopefully,
last) bug in PR 15809 are separate bugs.  I therefore switch back
to "Please commit if OK"-mode.

(Jus for reference: The explanation of the patch and Changelog
entry was posted here
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2005-08/msg00514.html,
and the patch itself (which I forgot to attach the first time)
here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2005-08/msg00516.html)


        Erik



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list