Tag reorg

[Daniel Berlin]

On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 01:18 +0100, Giovanni Bajo wrote:
> Joseph S. Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> 
> >> For old branches that are dead and of no use (because they are
> >> merged into newer branches), I'm include to rm them, and for old
> >> branches that have ideas, but, may never see the light of day, be
> >> conservative and leave them alone.
> >
> > I'd rather put dead branches which had development but have now been
> > merged into newer branches or mainline in branches/closed instead of
> > removing them
> 
> Why?
> 
> I fail to see any reason for this. When you don't need a file anymore, you
> delete it. When you don't need a directory anymore, you delete it. I can't see
> why it should be any different for branches. Deleting a branch makes life
> easier for people looking for branches, reduce the noise, and makes the
> repository cleaner.

Yeah. personally, i'd like to remove them too.

You can always see them with the url@rev syntax

ie

svn ls svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches@105944