[gomp] New tests

[Diego Novillo]

On Monday 17 October 2005 12:28, Jakub Jelinek wrote:

> By any chance, do you have the Fortran testcases as well?
>
Not yet.  I should have them ready before EOD.

> So, IMHO either we should translate it into GOMP_flush function call and
> do the __sync_synchronize (); in libgomp, or use something equally
> strong to a non-pure function call to prevent optimizations across it.
>
Yeah, that'd be the easiest approach.  OMP's memory model asks for 
consistency at flush and lock points (1.4.2 and 3.3).  Annoyingly, no such 
text seems to exist for barrier.