[PATCH] Don't use slowcompare method unconditionally
Kelley Cook
kelley.cook@sbcglobal.net
Wed Nov 9 16:31:00 GMT 2005
> I don't think so. I'm using coreutils-5.93, release apparently 3
days
> ago, and it refuses tail +NNN form by default.
> Of course I can use "_POSIX2_VERSION=199506 tail +16c" instead of
just
> tail +16c and it will work, but that doesn't sound to me like
"coreutils
> has already been fixed".
So wouldn't defining a POSIX_TAIL="_POSIX2_VERSION=199506 tail" and
using then using $(POSIX_TAIL) +16c be a more complete idea for bith
broken and non-broken coreutils?
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list