PR/17845: looking for a superclass in the wrong package

[Paolo Bonzini]

Andrew Haley wrote:
> Paolo Bonzini writes:
>  > The patch removes a path for looking a superclass that seems bogus to 
>  > me.  gcj would try every package name defined so far, which depends on 
>  > the files on the command line, and has no correspondance in the JLS.  
>  > Ranjit Mathew tested the patch for me:
> 
> This looks OK as it passes Jacks.
> 
> Is there a test case we can add to the testsuite?

There is one attached to PR17845, I'll see if I can make something 
similar without using java.* class names.

Paolo