[PATCH, 4.0] back port: Make TREE_OVERFLOWed constant gimple_min_invariant
Diego Novillo
dnovillo@redhat.com
Tue May 17 18:03:00 GMT 2005
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 02:00:08PM -0400, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> It was also part of Zdenek's original patch too.
>
My implied question was whether it's needed and why.
> Ok, I will remove it then.
>
If it's needed, then you shouldn't remove it. I just don't see
how it is related to the overflow change. It's also missing from
the ChangeLog entry.
Diego.
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list