[PATCH, 4.0] back port: Make TREE_OVERFLOWed constant gimple_min_invariant

Diego Novillo dnovillo@redhat.com
Tue May 17 18:03:00 GMT 2005


On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 02:00:08PM -0400, Andrew Pinski wrote:

> It was also part of Zdenek's original patch too.
>
My implied question was whether it's needed and why.


> Ok, I will remove it then.
> 
If it's needed, then you shouldn't remove it.  I just don't see
how it is related to the overflow change.  It's also missing from
the ChangeLog entry.


Diego.



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list