[PATCH]: Fix PR tree-optimization/21407

[Jakub Jelinek]

On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 07:47:16AM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> I think that the "what is an object" concerns apply in C++ too.  Though 
> you don't have "offsetof" for non-PODs, nothing says you can't just 
> *know* the offset and use it in the exact same way.  I really don't 
> think we can language-lawyer our away arounad the issues here; there is 
> no clear answer in the standard at this point.  We have to choose ourselves.

Or let the user choose, by providing a compiler switch for that.

	Jakub