[PATCH] PowerPC extendsfdf2 MEM alternative
Richard Henderson
rth@gcc.gnu.org
Mon Mar 14 13:39:00 GMT 2005
On Sat, Mar 12, 2005 at 01:46:59PM -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
> Is there a reason that output_constant_def() does not have the
> compress_float_constant() machinery?
Because the code above has to be modified to account for the difference.
What's your test case for this? I'm confused about how the path
wouldn't be expand_assignment -> store_expr -> emit_move_insn.
r~
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list