PATCH: testsuite/26_numerics/c99_classification_macros_c.cc

[Ben Elliston]

This test has been xfailed for all Linux systems, but I can't see how the test is
failing these days.  Okay to commit the following patch to mainline (with suitably
obvious ChangeLog entry)?

If this is not the correct patch, can anyone explain the rationale?

Cheers, Ben

Index: testsuite/26_numerics/cmath/c99_classification_macros_c.cc
===================================================================
RCS file:
/home/bje/gcc-cvs/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/26_numerics/cmath/c99_classification_macros_c.cc,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -p -r1.2 c99_classification_macros_c.cc
--- testsuite/26_numerics/cmath/c99_classification_macros_c.cc  2 Mar 2005 03:02:45
-0000       1.2
+++ testsuite/26_numerics/cmath/c99_classification_macros_c.cc  9 Mar 2005 02:47:46 -0000
@@ -27,8 +27,7 @@
  // invalidate any other reasons why the executable file might be covered by
  // the GNU General Public License.

-// { dg-do compile { xfail *-*-linux-gnu } }
-// { dg-excess-errors "" { target *-*-linux-gnu } }
+// { dg-do compile }

  #include <math.h>

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 256 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/attachments/20050309/c4639aa2/attachment.sig>