[PR c++/20280] hoist indirect_ref out of addressable cond_exprs

[Alexandre Oliva]

On Mar  4, 2005, Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> wrote:

> Your reading is logical, but it depends on exactly what "lvalue for a
> bit-field" means.  (Note that it does not say "lvalue *is* a
> bit-field"; it says "lvalue *for* a bit-field".)

Good point.  Here's an all-new patch, with the comment updated to
reflect our discussion.

Still testing on x86_64-linux-gnu, ok to install if it succeeds?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: gimplify-lvalue-cond-expr.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 5014 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/attachments/20050304/21e43d21/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------

-- 
Alexandre Oliva             http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer   aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist  oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}