Fix profiling for PIC Thumb code

[Richard Earnshaw]

On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 15:50, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 15:32, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > Gas accepts (and does very little with, nowadays) the "(PLT)" suffix for
> > ARM.  However, it doesn't accept it for Thumb.  All the uses of
> > NEED_PLT_RELOC are already guarded by TARGET_ARM except for this one.
> > 
> > OK for HEAD and csl-arm-branch?  Not sure about 4.0 - definitely it is not a
> > regression.
> 
> OK for head and csl-arm.
> 
> My inclination is to leave it out of 4.0.  It might still be possible to
> use gcc-4 with an assembler/linker combination that is old enough not to
> do the right thing if the marking is omitted.  By the time we get to 4.1
> I think there will be sufficiently new features in the ARM port to
> require upgrading binutils to something that can cope.
> 
> R.

Following a request from Eric Christopher, I've re-reviewed this patch,
and on reflection I can't see any reason why it would cause problems on
4.0, so could you install it there too?

R.

[for some reason I was thinking you were trying to remove (PLT) markings
unconditionally, not just in thumb mode]