some top-level changes

Ben Elliston bje+dated+1120598215.94475e@air.net.au
Thu Jun 30 21:17:00 GMT 2005


> We have a number of other projects listed there that aren't part of
> our source trees (like "hello" or "textutils").  Why can't expect
> and dejagnu have the same status?  Is there any harm in leaving them
> in?  You never know when some third party (Red Hat Inc comes to
> mind) will want to build everything in one tree themselves.

This is the objection I was anticipating and, if that's considered to
be the case, then that's fine.  Patch withdrawn.  :-)

Ben
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/attachments/20050630/390fa99a/attachment.sig>


More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list