[warnings] tagging warnings about options themselves
Gabriel Dos Reis
gdr@integrable-solutions.net
Fri Jul 22 05:41:00 GMT 2005
DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com> writes:
| > Indeed, my fear -- often repeated -- is a multiplication of options
| > just about everything. That would become unmanageable.
|
| I don't like the idea of options that are sentences either, but OTOH I
| do like the idea of having all warnings be controllable. Maybe a
| catch-all option isn't such a bad idea after all?
|
| -Wother-warnings
| Enable or disable other warnings, which aren't already controlled by
| their own specific options.
In addition of -Wextra? I'm not sure.
[...]
| Heck, it's better than -Wno-574818
That for sure! :-)
-- Gaby
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list