PATCH RFA: Patch for PR 22057

Richard Henderson rth@redhat.com
Tue Jul 19 18:07:00 GMT 2005


On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 12:47:42PM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> I looked into various possibilities of preserving the line number when
> the forwarding block was removed, but then ...

... forgot that fixing this properly might help optimized debugging?  ;-)

What kinds of things did you try?  I was thinking that the forwarder
block optimization might copy the line number of the goto being 
eliminated as well.  That would fix this test case at any rate; I'm
not sure what other sort of effects it would have.


r~



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list