PATCH RFA: Patch for PR 22057
Richard Henderson
rth@redhat.com
Tue Jul 19 18:07:00 GMT 2005
On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 12:47:42PM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> I looked into various possibilities of preserving the line number when
> the forwarding block was removed, but then ...
... forgot that fixing this properly might help optimized debugging? ;-)
What kinds of things did you try? I was thinking that the forwarder
block optimization might copy the line number of the goto being
eliminated as well. That would fix this test case at any rate; I'm
not sure what other sort of effects it would have.
r~
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list